Estatus económico y situación afectiva en América Latina

Mariano Rojas

Resumo


Este artículo presenta los resultados de una investigación cuantitativa donde se estudia cómo el estado afectivo de los latinoamericanos depende de su posición o estatus económico. La investigación hace uso de la encuesta Gallup 2007, con más de 14000 observaciones para 18 países de la región. Se estudian estados afectivos positivos y negativos, así como el balance afectivo. Se encuentra que la situación afectiva de los latinoamericanos depende de su estatus económico; esto es: más que como un indicador de acceso a satisfactores, el ingreso de una persona juega un papel de demarcador de posición social y es esto lo que influye en el estado afectivo de los latinoamericanos. La única excepción a la importancia del estatus económico se presenta en los adultos mayores. Los resultados apoyan la visión de que los estados afectivos están estrechamente vinculados a la inmersión social de las personas.


Palavras-chave


Afectos; Estatus; América Latina; Felicidad; Bienestar Subjetivo

Texto completo:

PDF (English) PDF

Referências


ARGYLE, M. The Psychology of Happiness. New York: Routledge, 2002.

BENTHAM, J. Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London: Payne, 1789.

BOYCE. C., BROWN, G.; MOORE, Y. S.. Money and Happiness: Rank of Income, not Income, affects Life Satisfaction. Psychological Science, 21, p. 471-475, 2010.

CROOKER, K.; NEAR, J. Happiness and Satisfaction: Measures of Affect and Cognition? Social Indicators Research, 44, p. 195-224,1998.

CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M. The Flow Experience and its Significance for Human Psychology. In: CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M. Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1988, p. 15-35.

DE BOTTON, A. Status Anxiety. England: Hamish Hamilton Ltd, 2004

DOHMEN, J. Philosophers on the “Art-of-Living”. Journal of Happiness Studies 4, p. 351-371, 2003.

EASTERLIN, R.A. Does Economic Growth Enhance the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence. In: DAVID, P.A.; REDER, M. (Orgs.), Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honour of Moses Abramovitz. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, 1974, p. 89–125.

FRANK, R. The Demand for Unobservable and Other Nonpositional Goods. The American Economic Review, 75(1), p. 101-116, 1985.

FRANK, R. Luxury Fever: Money and Happiness in an Era of Excess. USA: Princeton University Press, 2000.

FRANK, R. Falling behind: How Rising Inequality harms the Middle Class. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007.

FRIJDA, N.; MANSTEAD, A.; BEM, S. Emotions and Beliefs: How Feelings Influence Thoughts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

GOLEMAN, D. La Inteligencia Emocional. Argentina: Javier Vergara, 2004.

HAYAKAWA, H.; VENIERIS, Y. Consumer interdependence via reference groups. Journal of Political Economy, 85(3), pp. 599-615, 1977.

HIRSCH, F. Social Limits to Growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1976.

HYMAN, H. Reflections on reference groups. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 24(3), p. 383-396, 1960.

KEYNES, J. Economic Possibilities of Our Grandchildren. Essays in Persuasion. London: MacMillan, 1931.

KREPS, D. Curso de Teoría Microeconómica. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995.

LOEWENSTEIN, G.; LERNER, J. The Role of Affect in Decision Making. In: SCHERER, D.; GOLDSMITH, H. Handbook of Affective Sciences.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003, p. 619-642.

MARMOT, M. The Status Syndrome: How Social Standing Affects Our Health and Longevity. New York: Times Books, 2005.

MARX, K. Wage Labour and Capital. In: MCLELLAN, D .Karl Marx: Selected Writings. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977, p. 248-268.

MICHALOS, A. Multiple Discrepancy Theory. Social Indicators Research, 16(4),p. 347-414, 1985.

PRAAG, VAN B.; FERRER-I-CARBONEL, L. Happiness Quantified: A Satisfaction Calculus Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

RAYO, L.; BECKER, G.; RAYO, L.; BECKER, G. Evolutionary Efficiency and Happiness. Journal of Political Economy, 115(2), p. 302-337, 2007.

ROJAS, M. The Complexity of Well-Being: A Life-Satisfaction Conception and a Domains-of-Life Approach, In: GOUGH, I.; MCGREGOR, A. (Orgs.).Researching Well-Being in Developing Countries: From Theory to Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, p. 259-280.

ROJAS, M. Experienced Poverty and Income Poverty in Mexico: A Subjective Well-Being Approach. World Development, 36(6), p. 1078-1093, 2008.

ROJAS, M. Más allá del Ingreso: Progreso y Bienestar Subjetivo. In: ROJAS, M. (Org.). La Medición del Progreso y del Bienestar: Propuestas desde América Latina. Foro Consultivo Científico y Tecnológico: México DF, 2011, p.29-39.

ROJAS, M.; VEENHOVEN, R. Contentment and Affect in the Appraisal of Happiness. Social Indicators Research, 110 (2), p.415-431, 2013.

ROSENWEIN, B. Problems and Methods in the History of Emotions, Passions in Context International Journal for the History and Theory of Emotions, Potsdam, n. 1, p. 1-33, 2010. Available: . Acess in: 10 feb. 2013.

SCHOR, J. The Overworked American. USA.: Basic Books, 1992.

SCHOR, J. The Overspent American: Upscaling, Downshifting and the New Consumer. New York: Basic Books, 1998.

SMITH, A. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. New York, Modern Library, 1937.

VEBLEN, T. The Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: Vanguard Press, 1927.

VEENHOVEN, R. Conditions of Happiness.Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, 1984.

VEENHOVEN, R.Is Happiness Relative? Social Indicators Research, 24, p. 1-34, 1991.

VEENHOVEN, R. Arts-of-Living. Journal of Happiness Studies,4, p. 373-384, 2003.

WILKINSON, R. Unhealthy Societies: the Afflictions of Inequality. London: Routledge, 1996.

WILKINSON, R.; PICKETT, K. The Spirit Level: Why more equal Societies are almost always Better. London: Allen Lane, 2009.

ZEELENBERG, M.; PIETERS, R. Feeling Is for Doing: A Pragmatic Approach to the Study of Emotions in Economic Behavior. In: DE CREMER, D.; ZEELENBERGY, M.; MURNIGHAN, J.K. (Orgs.). Social Psychology and Economics. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2006, p. 117-137.